This is exactly the expression I use when I am portraying depression.
[Sad News via wikimedia]

One of my favorite cases is depression. I know it sounds weird, but I love seeing how students handle it. Some are remarkably kind and empathetic, while some want to pass me over to a counselor as soon as humanly possible.

Regardless, here's feedback I often give learners dealing with a patient suffering from depression:

• Match the patient's energy: When a learner enters my room cheerfully and remains cheerful throughout the encounter despite my obviously uncheerful affect, I feel as if we are inhabiting two completely different realities. When the learner adjusts to more closely match my energy at the beginning of the encounter, I feel more understood and comfortable. However, as the authority, it's important the learner matches my emotional level without being pulled into it entirely. If the learner goes too far, I won't feel confident they will be able to pull us both out.

• Shape the conversation: Learners often want to jump into a depression screening as soon as they think I have depression. The traditional LMNOPQRSTU format doesn't always seem applicable because there is often no physical pain, but honestly, even with depression it's a good place to start because it helps me establish an HPI, which helps me feel heard. This also allows me to answer several easier questions to establish trust & safety with the learner before moving onto the more emotionally charged depression screening questions. Save the self-harm and suicide questions until the end (more on this below).

• Focus: Once a learner suspects depression, s/he usually wants to fix it. But it's impossible to fix depression in a 15-minute session. So I encourage learners to find better goals for the encounter. For instance, I think some good goals are to establish trust, assess my safety and get me to come back for another appointment. Anything else that gets handled is a bonus (within the confines of that case's learning goals, of course).

• Listen: I frequently tell learners during emotional and/or sensitive encounters, "Your job is to keep proving you are a safe person to talk to." So every active listening skill is critical to establish trust and safety: sincerity & other non-verbal cues, reflection, open-ended questions, validation, empathy, framing for sensitive questions, avoiding interruption & judgment, etc.

• Know when to keep things moving: Very occasionally I have a learner who is so empathetic and open to listening that we don't make any progress. As a patient, this can feel as if I've wasted my visit. So during feedback I talk with learners about how make progress while while remaining a trustworthy listener. This often involves setting achievable goals, a clear framework, collaboration, summarization, reflection, and the occasional kindly redirection.

• Showing the work: Even if it's completely obvious to the learner, depression may not be obvious to me, or may be associated with stigma I am unable to verbalize/recognize. Many patients do not come in for depression. They come in because they're tired or unable to concentrate, for example. So if the learner jumps to depression without explaining how it relates to my chief complaint(s), I will feel labeled instead of understood. If the learner asks questions or performs exams that don't seem related to my chief complaint(s) (like the mini mental status exam, for instance), it is likely to affect my trust in the learner and impair my motivation to return to this or any other medical professional.

• Asking about self-harm/suicide: I usually tell learners to leave this question until last because the answer could radically change everything and is the hardest question for me to answer. Plus, any question asked after this feels incredibly trivial. Everything a learner has done up up to this point to build trust, safety & rapport will allow me to feel more comfortable answering. How a learner asks this question is vital to ensuring a truthful answer, requiring appropriate framing & sincerity. I tell learners that changing their tone, posture, and eye contact are really helpful. Using my name helps focus me. 

If I admit to suicidal/self-harm thoughts, using validation & normalization can help convey acceptance and support: "Thank you for telling me that, [name]. It's very normal for someone going through what you're going through to have those thoughts. If you ever have thoughts like that from here on out, I want you to call [x]." Wait to assess my reaction. When it seems like I am ready to move on, without belaboring the point, offer hope by transitioning to the plan: "So, let's talk about how we get you feeling better."

If I deny those thoughts, then great! Validation & normalization are still useful to help transition to the plan and create a buffer in case I am lying: "I'm glad to hear that, [name]. Because it's very normal for someone going through what you're going through to have those thoughts. If you ever have thoughts like that I want you to call [x]." And then transition to the plan in the same way: "So, let's talk about how we get you feeling better."

• Identify and replace coping strategies first: if the learner remembers to ask about drugs/alcohol, and then recommends I take medications without addressing my alcohol usage, I cringe inside as an SP. But worse, if the learner realizes I am drinking too much, s/he often recommends I stop drinking while I am on medications -- and as a patient I often react by being visibly worried/agitated/concerned. Because nothing terrifies me more than the idea that my only coping strategies will be ripped away, I feel a lot less likely to follow up on the learner's recommendations. So as an SP I am really impressed with learners who understand the FIRST first step is replacing (or skillfully reducing my dependence on) unhealthy coping strategies.

• Simplify the plan: When I am depressed, too many choices feel overwhelming. So when learners tell me all the things they want me to do to help me manage my depression (often involving changes to exercise, diet, alcohol/drugs, medications, and/or therapy), as a patient I can feel myself shut down. Any one of those things can be its own major project! A more successful strategy might be limiting the options to the most successful candidates based on what the learner has gleaned about the patient during the encounter. Another good strategy would be to ask the patient: which of these limited options sounds like something I would want to begin when I leave the office? This respects my autonomy even in the midst of a difficult time, helps me feel invested in the plan and motivates me to return for followup.

It's a trap!

How I feel when I don't know an obvious answer my character would know.
[Fox Caught in a Trap via wikimedia]

Dear faculty: when you write a case and are picking professions for your patients, I beg you, do not make me or any of my family members a medical professional/student. It just leads to questions that are difficult for me to answer, like...

• Did you try anything for the pain? (As an SP, unless scripted the answer is "no" which hardly makes sense for most patients, much less a medical professional)

• What do you/your family member think is going on? (It is unusual for a case to contain this information, but answering "I have no idea" makes me sound like a terrible medical professional.)

• What was your MCAT score? (I don't even know the right scale!)

• Oh, what classes are you taking? (Ummm. Anatomy?)

• Oh, what hospital are you working at? (Uh....)

• Oh, your XYZ muscle? ("I'm not sure; it's been a while since I've had to study anatomy. Ha ha!")

• What specialty? (Quick, pick one this student is unlikely to know a lot about!)

&etc.

Having a medical connection makes a student waste valuable time by asking me questions I have to invent the answers to, which could lead to either leading them down the wrong path OR corroding the veracity of the encounter when I am unable to improvise inappropriately. My main technique is to deflect, but even that can seem suspicious, as it is normal for people to build rapport based on similarities.

In addition, when I am written as a medical professional I can't just act like another patient. For instance, I feel I can't evaluate jargon as well because my character already understand the language. I would not be surprised by a mini mental status exam, or many physical exams, or unclear instructions. So feedback about items like that will be necessarily limited from a patient perspective.

Setting the Standard

Unless a case is meant to be interprofessional, keep SP jobs related to the chief complaint/injury or neutral. Pick one that is not highly intriguing to students.

HEENT checklist

An SP after a HEENT exam.
[Bartholin head transect via wikimedia]

The Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose & Throat exam is one of the most vulnerable exams for a patient because it uses pointy objects and bright lights near sensitive orifices. I don't know how SPs get used to this. I am pretty strict & consistent in my reactions during this exam because I want to remind students be especially considerate and careful in this region.

Here are some of the things I am looking for during an HEENT exam:

This is a living list. Last updated October 29, 2015.

Head

• Palpation: Careful of earrings and glasses when present. Use the word "touch" instead of palpation.

• Inspection: Verbalize inspection. When you do, don't use alarming words like "lesions."

 Eyes

• Reaching for my eyes is scary! Warn me before touching near them, ideally demonstrating on yourself.

• Conjunctiva: if you can, allow me to pull my own lower lids down and look up instead of doing it for me. This gives me more control in a vulnerable situation.

• Checking for pupillary reflex: tell me where to look. Otherwise, as a patient I am primed to look directly at the thing in front of my face, and when a bright light is suddenly flashed in my eye I may wince or blink or jerk in a way that gives you an incorrect finding.

• Ophthalmoscope/fundoscopic exam: tell me what you're doing before you do it. Tell me where to look. If you don't have to use the brightest light, I would appreciate it. If you're going to brace against me, warn me before you do. Don't, under any circumstances, brace yourself by placing your finger on my lip (I am surprised this happens as often as it does).

• Using a Snellen chart: if you ask me to "read the smallest line," I read the text on the bottom of the card. Be specific if it matters! 

• Checking visual fields: If you ask "Do you see my fingers?" I will turn my head to look at them. Yep, I see them. Tell me where to look if it matters! Also, sometimes students don't start far enough back (so I can always see the fingers) or come far enough forward (so I can never see the fingers despite that I can see the student shaking with the effort of trying to wiggle them). 

• Accommodation/convergence: tell me to keep my head still, or I am likely to move my head when I see a pen get too close too my face. Best practice: "I want to see how your eyes are moving. Please keep your eyes on this pen and your head still as I move it towards you."

• If I am wearing glasses and you ask me to take them off, especially for the ophthalmoscope exam, I will readily agree -- and then leave them on the table until you remember to tell me I can put them back on. Patients without their glasses can feel even more vulnerable while they aren't wearing them, so the sooner you tell me the better I feel about your awareness and consideration. Unfortunately, it is not unusual for me to have my glasses off for the rest of the encounter.

Ears

• Pointy things in my ears is one of the worst parts of being an SP. I've only had a handful of students cause pain, though. To achieve the highest standard, you must break the plane of my ears and use a cone.

Nose

• But pointy things in my nose is actually worse than pointy things in my ears. How you treat my ears is similar to the way you will treat my nose. To achieve the highest standard, you must break the plane of my nostrils and use a cone (it can be the same cone as my ear, but not vice versa!). 

• Sinus percussion: For heaven's sake, warn me before you start tapping on my face. It can be a very startling sensation if a patient doesn't know it's coming, and even more so in such a vulnerable area. Many patients don't understand what areas are involved when you invoke the word "sinus": if I think you're only going to examine my nose, reaching for my eyes will be a surprise. A better explanation: "I'm going to tap above and below your eyes; please tell me if it's tender." Demonstrate on yourself as your explain it. Always use the word "tap" instead of "percuss." 

• Ask me to tilt my head back rather than pushing it back yourself. I've had students push me back with a hand on my forehead or a finger under my nose, and both ways feel less respectful than asking me to move myself. 

•  SP Pro Tip: when the student inserts the speculum into your nose, hold your breath so the moisture doesn't fog the lens. The exam is quicker that way. 

 Throat

• If you ask me to open my mouth, I will, but I won't stick my tongue out until asked. If asked to say "Ah," I will try to do it without breathing directly into your faces if possible.

• Lymph node palpation: I prefer firm deliberate pressure as opposed to tiny tickling fingers underneath my chin.

• Thyroid palpation: Describe the exam before you put your hands around my neck. Since this exam is frequently done from behind and with a fairly firm pressure, it can otherwise feel alarming. 

• SP Pro Tip: If you are an SP in a school that includes a thyroid exam, I highly recommend beginning saliva production after the oral exam and only swallowing half of it when asked, in case the student requests another swallow.

Abdominal exam checklist

Open wide!
[Bartholin abdominal anatomy via wikimedia]

When I do a case that requires an abdominal exam, I am simultaneously relieved and apprehensive. I am relieved because the exam is a simple one to evaluate (unlike the neuro exam). I am apprehensive because I never know how I'll feel after a day of belly poking.

Here are some of the things I am looking for during an abdominal exam:

This is a living list. Last updated February 01, 2015.

• Draping technique: Very much like ungowning instructions, draping requires confidence, clear expectations/instructions, and a willingness to give as much control as possible to the patient. Best practice: "I'm going to lay this sheet over your legs. Please lie back and lift your gown to just below your breasts so I can examine your stomach." The drape should cover my pelvic bones (at the very least; I actually prefer my belly button) as I pull my gown up, and then be rolled back later. If the student turns his/her head away after the drape is lowered, it makes me feel like s/he respects my modesty. If a student doctor needs a clearer view of the lower quadrants, the student doctor should ask me to roll down my shorts -- the student should never try to roll it down for me or slip the stethoscope underneath. Both of those things feel very intimate and violating.
• Inspection: Verbalization is crucial for SPs (otherwise, how do we know students are looking for anything?), but I think it's a good idea for patients, too. If a student doctor uses words like "lesions" or "masses," as a patient I start to get nervous even if the findings are negative.
• Auscultation: Listening must happen in all four quadrants. I grade tough on the lower quadrants, so even if student doctors put the stethoscope down four times, if all contacts are above or at the belly button, I don't given them credit. Similarly, listening should happen on the skin, not on the drape. As always, student doctors should announce their intentions before performing auscultation. Use the word "listen" rather than "auscultate."
• Percussion: like auscultation, percussion is only valid in all four quadrants and should be on the skin. Unlike auscultation, it is crucial for the student-doctor to warn me about percussion before it happens because it is such an alarming, unexpected feeling otherwise. When warning me, "tap" is a word that makes more sense to me as a patient than "percuss." This is also true for the liver exam.
• Palpation: like auscultation & percussion, palpation is only valid in all four quadrants and should be on the skin. Like percussion, it is crucial for the student doctor to warn me about palpation, especially that one round will be light and another round will be deep. When warning me, use the word "press" rather than "palpate." Palpation tends to be the most variable aspect of the SP exam: many student are unwilling to press firmly in a scenario. So while my stomach feel less pummeled at the end of the day, I don't feel I can grade as effectively. And those student doctors who do push hard, push haaard. Can't there be something in between?
• Rebound tenderness: make it clear this is a rebound test, not another form of palpation. Push and hold for a couple of seconds, then suddenly release. Be sure to ask if it hurts more pushing down or coming up. If there is pain, be sure to ask where the pain is located: the palpated side or elsewhere?
• Abdominal aorta: the abdominal aorta exam tends to be pretty uncomfortable, even more so than deep palpation. I appreciate student doctors when they tell me that and when they tell me what they're looking for or it just seems like more random pushing on my abdomen.
• Liver/spleen: having someone hook their hands under your ribs can be both uncomfortable and intimate, so it's very important to explain before the exam. When a student doctor percusses the liver, I feel more comfortable when I know how large the area will be beforehand -- many patients have no idea how large their organs are.
• Obturator & Psoas: If I don't know why you're asking me to move my legs, I don't feel as if you understand my abdominal pain.
• Neutral hand positioning: brushing or resting your hand near my pubis or thigh during this exam is very alarming, especially if the student is of the opposite sex.
• Clear instructions & informed consent: "May I palpate your stomach?" How can I consent if I don't know what "palpate" means? How can I consent to a liver, spleen or gall bladder exam if I don't know where they are? As a patient I will say "yes" because I assume the consequences of saying "no" are worse.
• Closing: when a student doctor summarizes the findings, that helps me understand the exam is over. When a student doctor offers to help me up, I feel grateful even if I refuse the help.

Extra credit!
I did not know Saint Erasmus "is venerated as the patron saint of sailors and abdominal pain" until just now. I will think of him at my next abdominal exam.

Pain scales

Ideally, when I am portraying a patient in pain, my portrayal will give student doctors a clue as to how much pain I am in. But students are also trained to ask the classic question: "Can you rate your pain for me?"

Classic universal pain scale via nshealth.ca.
[click to embiggen]

Above is the classic pain scale. However, instead of saying "zero being no pain and 10 being the worst pain possible" students often say, "where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the worst pain you've ever felt." I always think this is a little limiting, because the scale could change for each patient depending on how much pain a patient has experienced in a lifetime. For instance, a patient who has given birth may rate an ankle sprain at a 6, whereas someone who has sprained an ankle may rate it a 10 if nothing else worse has happened to them. Cases are written so that all patients give the same rating, but when the question is asked this way, as an SP I always have to think about it: what is the worst pain I've ever felt? (Pulmonary embolism, in case you're wondering.)

Sometimes, student doctors will simply ask "Can you rate your pain on a scale of 1-10" and I have learned to ask "Is 10 bad or is 10 good?" to remind them they haven't given the patient a complete scale. Because outside of the simulation, if a doctor doesn't clarify, the patient may give what s/he considered to be a reasonable guess, and the doctor may get incorrect information.

Badly written cases will often only have one pain rating attached even though the pain has changed over time. So if  student doctors ask questions like "What did the pain start at?" or "How long has it been at a 4?" as an SP I always wince and guess. The rule of responding to cases that don't have a definitive answer to a student question is that the answer is either "no," "I don't know," or that the answer won't affect the case. But I certainly feel like a better SP and more standardized when I know the answers to good questions.

I say our affect should be an indicator to the patient's pain level, but only one school I work with attempts to standardize SPs to portray pain based on the case rating -- and then usually only for the really important cases that could affect a student continuing with the program. This can make it more difficult for student doctors to interpret my pain, because other SPs may portray a 6 less seriously than I do. Some students may feel I am "overacting" if I portray a 6 with a "wrinkled nose, raised upper lip, rapid breathing," even though that's the official pain scale.

However, my favorite pain scale is from Hyperbole and a Half:

0:  Hi.  I am not experiencing any pain at all.  I don't know why I'm even here.
1:  I am completely unsure whether I am experiencing pain or itching or maybe I just have a bad taste in my mouth.
2:  I probably just need a Band Aid.
3:  This is distressing.  I don't want this to be happening to me at all.
4:  My pain is not fucking around.
5:  Why is this happening to me??
6:  Ow.  Okay, my pain is super legit now.

7:  I see Jesus coming for me and I'm scared.
8:  I am experiencing a disturbing amount of pain.  I might actually be dying.  Please help.
9:  I am almost definitely dying.
10:  I am actively being mauled by a bear.
11: Blood is going to explode out of my face at any moment.
Too Serious For Numbers:  You probably have ebola.  It appears that you may also be suffering from Stigmata and/or pinkeye.

This scale is the one that most closely matches how I actually feel about pain in my own life. Honestly, if I rate something as a 9, I want the doctor to know I feel I am almost definitely dying. Few people go to the doctor unless the pain is at least a 3 or more. So even though a 3 is considered "mild" pain in the classic scale, it's significant enough to drive the patient to see a doctor. In other words, the pain is bad enough for someone to miss work and/or pay a lot of money to address it. At that point, no pain is "mild" pain, in my opinion. As a patient, one of my biggest fears is that the doctor won't take my pain seriously. I worry they may think a 6 is mild, even though, as the Better Pain Chart shows, I feel like "my pain is super legit now."

Sometimes, students describe the pain scale "where 0 is no pain at all and 10 is the worst pain imaginable." When they do, I smile to myself and think of this xkcd comic:

[click to embiggen]

I can imagine a LOT of pain. Cases always have pain ratings attached to them that won't fluctuate based on how students ask this question, but when the scale is described to me this way I think, if I were a real patient, I would drastically revise my estimate downward.

Extra credit!
If students ask about the ADL scale right after the pain scale, it can be very confusing for patients because the scale is reversed. When that happens, I think it's better to ask about it as a percentage than a single number.

Further reading:
McSweeny's has a delightful article about SPs being trained to simulate pain. Wish more schools did this!

Postscript (Jun01.2020): 

When the coronavirus devastated the profession, this pain scale felt especially appropriate:

Neuro exam checklist

Looks pretty simple, doesn't it?
[from Bell's Explaining the Course of the Nerves via wikimedia]

In the "classic" SP encounter, I am tasked to memorize a case, act it with the students, keep track of what the student is or isn't doing while in the encounter, complete a checklist after the student leaves, and then give feedback to the student after the checklist is complete. Wash, rinse, repeat up to 20 times a day.

Of those types of cases, the hardest one is the neuro case, because the neuro exam has so many things to remember. Most physical exams have a limited number of discrete actions on a small segment of the body. The neuro exam, however, is literally head to toe. A complete neuro exam can include as many as 40 items -- on top of memorizing the history and communication checklists!

And for patients, the neuro exam is often the most obtuse exam. The other exams are generally pretty obvious: if I come with stomach pain, I expect the student to do an abdominal exam. But neuro exams can be used for several cases, including headaches, seizures, palsy, strokes, hypertentions, stress, cardio, confusion, etc.

So when students don't explain what they are looking for, parts of the neuro exam can feel like complete nonsense. My doctor wants me to do what? And what does it have to do with the problem I came in for? Without appropriate expectations management, this can erode my trust and confidence in the student doctor. Plus, since students primarily practice on each other, they anticipate the next step in the process and forget the patient doesn't know it. So when I give feedback after neuro exams, it's primarily focused on expectations management, autonomy and consent.

Here are some of the things I am looking for during a neuro encounter:

This is a living list. Last updated Apr09, 2014.

• Associated symptoms: When students ask only about associated symptoms, I have learned to say "Like what?" so that I don't inadvertently give something away. When students ask about "auras" without explanation, as a patient I find that really confusing, and I may suddenly wonder if I am visiting a New Age doctor instead of an MD. When students ask about "visual changes" I don't know how to answer unless they give examples.
• Eye movement: students almost always forget to tell me to follow the movement of the pen with my eyes only. If they tell me to follow the pen, I move my whole head and wait to see if they notice. Some don't -- which means I can't give them credit for doing an H exam. Most do, and when they stop to give me clearer instructions without apologizing, as a patient I often feel both embarrassed and annoyed.
• Checking visual fields: If a student asks "Do you see my fingers?" I turn my head to look at them. Yep, I see them. Tell me where to look if it matters!
• Shining a light in my eyes: tell me where to look. If you don't have to use the very brightest setting, please don't.
• Examining eyes with ophthalmoscope: tell me where to look. Also, tell me you're going to get so close to me before you do, or I might start backing away. Never touch my lips with your finger to brace yourself. If you're going to use my forehead to brace yourself, warn or ask me before you do it. If you're going to lift my eyelid up, definitely warn me -- but I recommend checking without lifting first to see if you can get what you need in the most minimally invasive way.
• Using a Snellen chart: if a student asks me to "read the smallest line" I read the text on the bottom of the card. Be specific if it matters!
• Checking hearing: I feel more comfortable if I am able to cover my ear rather than the student doctor doing it. If I can see the student doctor's hands while they rub their fingers together, that can affect the outcome of the exam. If a student doctor rubs their fingers together but doesn't ask me if I hear it, I do not respond. I really appreciate when students use words like "taco" or "raspberry" during the whisper tests rather than "ABC" or "123." I feel more comfortable during the Weber or Rinne tests when the student doctor clearly explains why and how they are using the tuning fork.
• Facial expressions: This is the part of the exam where I feel like I'm on Candid Camera. Tell me why you want me to make funny faces for you. Do not use the words "innervate" when you do. Some variation of this is fine: "I'd like to test some nerves in your face, so I'm going to ask you to make a few funny expressions. Can you [smiles/frown/etc]?" If the student-doctor does it with me, I don't feel quite as ridiculous. If the student-doctor asks me to puff out my cheeks but does not tell me to keep them puffed as they push them, I will let them collapse -- which sometimes leads students to believe there is a finding when there isn't.
• Opening eyes against resistance: Quite often, students ask me to close my eyes and then try to open them without warning me. As a patient this Freaks. Me. Out. Feeling fingers against my closed eyes is very alarming because eyes are so vulnerable. But here's what's worse: opening my eyes as the student is reaching for them because as a patient I didn't know there was more to the test beyond closing my eyes. Either way, as a patient I WILL flinch. If done inadequately, this test can make me feel extremely vulnerable and unsafe with the student doctor. If it has been prefaced by other tests that have affected my trust, this one has an even bigger impact.
• Checking for sensation: "Can you feel this?" is not the same as "Does this feel the same on both sides?" And if you just ask "Does this feel the same?" I am likely to say, "The same as what?" unless you've specified comparison on both sides. When student doctors don't warn me before checking for sensation on my arms/legs, it can feel a little creepy, especially when the person is of the opposite gender. When checking for facial sensation, if a student reached towards my eyes before telling me about the facial sensation test, I will often move my head because as a patient I have no idea why they are reaching for a vulnerable area.
• Tongue deviation: "Stick your tongue out" can feel weird unless the student explains why (hopefully as part of the facial expressions). If you want me to open my mouth, tell me. Also, "Wiggle your tongue around" is not the same as "Move your tongue from side to side."
• Gag reflex: Schools have a lot of different policies on this. Some specifically ask student not to do it, some ask the SPs to fake a gag reflex as soon as it is clear that's what the student is testing for. And sadly, some actually want their students to actually test the gag reflex. I have a lot of tolerance for internal exams, but when that happens I fake the gag reflex immediately.
• Resistance tests: I feel very strongly that all resistance tests should be framed simply as "Push/pull against me" rather than "So I'm going to try to put your [body part] into [a position]. Don't let me." or "Resist me." The negative instruction makes me spend an extra second or two trying to figure out what the student doctor wants me to do. Additionally, it makes it much harder to when the actual test begins, because students are generally already holding my body in the position they want me to resist before they finish the instruction. It's as complicated to write as it is to work it all out on the table.
• Shoulder/neck resistance: With shoulder resistance, students often start by pushing down on my shoulders and when I don't automatically push up, they then have to explain the test. Sometimes they will tell me to lift my shoulders up and then push down on them -- without telling me to resist, so I let them push me down. Some students interpret this as a positive sign. The easiest way to perform this test is for the student to push down on my shoulder and say, "Please shrug your shoulders." Relatedly, if a student asks me to "Turn your head into my hand," as a patient I don't know whether they want me to rotate my head or tilt it towards my shoulder.
• Leg resistance: Don't ask me to push up both thighs against resistance at same time. Seriously, have you ever tried that? Do one at a time.
• Sharp/dull testing: For goodness sake, demonstrate sharp/dull testing once on my arm before going through the whole thing so I know what to expect. This is a million times more important if you're going to do it on my face. Also, do not be surprised when different parts of my body are more sensitive than others. That does not indicate a positive finding -- it just means jabbing me on the top of my foot with the same force as the outside of my thigh hurts more because the nerves are closer to the surface of the skin. If you are too tentative with your sharps, though, you may get false dull patches -- as an SP I am dying to tell you when that happens, but as a patient I just assume that's part of the test. If, as a patient, I have findings during a sharp/dull test, I often act surprised unless the patient has already observed it in the case history. That often prompts students to check again -- and if I give them an answer they expect, they cannot resist saying "yes, that's right." If the school has the student use a safety pin (?!!!) and the student has not shown it to me but I see it after the test, as a patient I will feel alarmed and betrayed. If my hand is not in the right position and a student moves it into position without asking while my eyes are closed, I will feel especially vulnerable.
• Reflexes: The thing I hate most about reflex testing is that almost every student grabs my arm without asking me or telling me why -- and I hate it even more so when they grab my hands (thumbs up). Moving a patient without their consent violates bodily autonomy, and as a patient it teaches me you do not value my consent. It is SO EASY and vastly more respectful to ask "Could you please place your arm here [indicating their own arm and waiting]? Okay, now relax your arm." Also, as an SP I have excellent reflexes (in both upper & lower extremities), so it is disheartening to discover lots of students are not able to elicit my reflexes correctly.
• Point-to-point and Rapid alternating movement: When students don't explain rapid alternating movement, I feel like I'm playing a child's game. This is especially true for the finger-to-nose test: as a patient, I wonder if the student doctor think I'm drunk.
• Orientation questions: When students ask me orientation questions without explanation, it seems unnecessarily ominous and obscure. Some are at least aware enough to say, "I'm going to ask you some silly questions." But rarely do they say why. Try "...to rule out anything serious." Afterwards, I would feel relieved if I was jokingly congratulated for passing this most obvious of exams.
• Gait and balance: "Hop off the table" seems a bit too informal for my tastes. Clear instructions about how to walk and how far to walk and why make me feel more comfortable.

Extra credit!
Because the neuro exam has so many items, students often feel rushed. That makes me feel anxious. As the exam progresses, the accumulation of abrupt and opaque exams can foster distrust -- which makes me feel even more anxious and cautious. And the more time student have to spend explaining or re-explaining the tests, the more rushed they feel. So the more students can pre-invest in finding simple ways to explain and manage the neuro exam for SPs, the faster and easier it will be for everyone, including the patients they see later in their careers.