"All right, now push against my hand."
[Werdende Kraft via wikimedia]

When learners do strength testing on my extremities, I often find myself confused by their instructions. Because learners often practice with each other, it means they practice with people who anticipate and act on what the learner intends, not what the learner has actually said. Plus, strength testing involves body positioning in a way where students are less likely to be mindful of physical autonomy.

I wrote about this a bit in "Neuro exam checklist," but it comes up frequently enough that I wanted to break it out into its own post. So this is the kind of feedback I give learners doing strength testing.

This is a living list. Last updated November 3, 2015

• Explain: Why are we doing strength testing, anyway? As a patient, it can look like a lot of work with no clear purpose, especially if the movements seem unrelated to my chief complaint.

• Stop talking: Learners frequently begin the test before they even finish telling me the instructions. So the test could be over before I even understand it has begun.

• Offer simple, clear instructions: I feel strongly that "Push against me" and "Pull against me" are far easier instructions for me to follow than "Resist my force." Or worse: "I'm going to push against you; don't let me." Framing things in the negative (ala "resist me") places a higher cognitive burden on me to figure out what the learner wants me to do to "resist." Plus, telling me to push/pull also makes it clear when the testing has begun, because I am in charge of the movement. If the learner is already pushing against me but I have not yet understood my counter move, it can give the learner a false positive.

• Let me move myself: During strength testing, learners may move my limbs into position while explaining the test, which makes me feel vulnerable. If learners allow me to move my arms or feet into position myself (including during reflex testing), I feel like I have some control over my own body.

• Indicate the end of the test: This can be as easy as saying "ok" or "thank you" (how polite!). Saying "great" or another filler can be awkward if I am clearly not doing well.

• Ease up on exit: When learners are eager to move on to the next test, they may let go while I am still exerting force, which drops my limb rapidly. When this tests neck muscles, this can be especially dangerous. But when learners are careful to ease pressure at the end of the test, I feel much more confident in their ability to be self-aware and treat me with respect.

Modesty & invasiveness in SP encounters

An SP tries to remain covered during an invasive exam.
[The Invasion via wikimedia]

Acting (or at the very least, memorization) is an important component to being an SP. But also important is self-awareness and comfort for varying levels of exposure & contact during an encounter. Generally speaking, if you want to be an SP, there are three kinds of exams you could be a part of:

• Interview: the student doctor asks history questions, counseling, etc. but does not perform a physical exam.

• Physical: the student doctor examines one or more body systems using hands and/or tools. This may or may not involve wearing a gown.

• Invasive: primarily breasts, pelvic & rectal exams. These are paid at a higher rate than the first two categories (though the rate widely varies across the US).

Some schools are explicit in these designations, while others do not bother to distinguish between the first two categories.

But these categories are pretty broad. For true ethical transparency, I think the categories should be even more nuanced. For instance, some of the physical scenarios can be invasive and uncomfortably intimate for some SPs who are modest, rightfully nervous of pointy things in their ears, or easily triggered.

Here's how I would categorize SP jobs:

• History Interview: student doctors ask questions about the patient's chief compliant, medical history, family medical history and/or social history. Relatively straightforward, without major revelations.

• Psych interview: Any interview that includes a major social or emotional component, as these require such different affects, reactions and feedback. Different SPs find different kinds of psych encounters draining. Some find depression exhausting, while others find mania exhausting.

• Basic physical exam: the student doctor examines one or more visible body systems using hands, eyes and tools. Neuro exams and mental status exams would qualify, too.

• Mildly invasive physical exam: anything that involves ungowning instructions would probably qualify for this category. Exposing the abdomen or chest is a modesty issue for some SPs, so heart and lung exams can be uncomfortable for them. Exams that require the SP (or the student) to move breast tissue would be part of this category, as would attaching leads. 

• Moderately invasive physical exam: I don't understand why there isn't more consideration and expectations management around HEENT exams, which involve sharp pointy cones in sensitive orifices like noses and ears. I know SPs who have been harmed in these exams. Eye exams, too, can qualify here, especially ones that involve students pulling on an SP's eyelids or pushing on the eyes in some way (neuro exams, looking for conjunctivitis, etc.). Checking for the liver and spleen can be pretty invasive & intimate depending on the school, as the student hooks his/her hands under an SP's ribs. And if a school wants students to check the inguinal nodes, SPs had better be aware of that and consent to it beforehand. Nobody wants a surprise inguinal exam.

• Majorly invasive physical exam: In addition to breast, pelvic, and rectal exams, I would include blood draws & biopsies in this category.

Additional components that may affect SP modesty during encounters:

• What is the level of undress required for each role even if the SP is in a gown? For instance: can the SP wear pants, or bike shorts? Can the SP wear tank tops or bras? 

• Who will be observing? SPs may feel more or less comfortable in group encounters, with peer observers, with faculty observers in the room, with faculty observers outside the room, with staff observation, or with video review after the event.

Extra credit:
I once worked for a school that wanted women to remove their bras for the event since students would be performing heart/lung exams. The school didn't think it was fair for the students who had female SPs to have to struggle with this complication when students who had male SPs did not. This is generally not acceptable, but even worse is that this was mentioned on the day of the exam. What SP was going to refuse at that point? That felt disrespectful (and frankly, sexist).

Setting the standard:
I think having knowledge of these categories is an important tool for SPs to choose the kinds of jobs they are comfortable with, especially when first starting out. For every event, make it clear what is expected of the SP before the SP accepts the job. Do not penalize SPs for refusing jobs outside their comfort level.

Neuro exam checklist

Looks pretty simple, doesn't it?
[from Bell's Explaining the Course of the Nerves via wikimedia]

In the "classic" SP encounter, I am tasked to memorize a case, act it with the students, keep track of what the student is or isn't doing while in the encounter, complete a checklist after the student leaves, and then give feedback to the student after the checklist is complete. Wash, rinse, repeat up to 20 times a day.

Of those types of cases, the hardest one is the neuro case, because the neuro exam has so many things to remember. Most physical exams have a limited number of discrete actions on a small segment of the body. The neuro exam, however, is literally head to toe. A complete neuro exam can include as many as 40 items -- on top of memorizing the history and communication checklists!

And for patients, the neuro exam is often the most obtuse exam. The other exams are generally pretty obvious: if I come with stomach pain, I expect the student to do an abdominal exam. But neuro exams can be used for several cases, including headaches, seizures, palsy, strokes, hypertentions, stress, cardio, confusion, etc.

So when students don't explain what they are looking for, parts of the neuro exam can feel like complete nonsense. My doctor wants me to do what? And what does it have to do with the problem I came in for? Without appropriate expectations management, this can erode my trust and confidence in the student doctor. Plus, since students primarily practice on each other, they anticipate the next step in the process and forget the patient doesn't know it. So when I give feedback after neuro exams, it's primarily focused on expectations management, autonomy and consent.

Here are some of the things I am looking for during a neuro encounter:

This is a living list. Last updated Apr09, 2014.

• Associated symptoms: When students ask only about associated symptoms, I have learned to say "Like what?" so that I don't inadvertently give something away. When students ask about "auras" without explanation, as a patient I find that really confusing, and I may suddenly wonder if I am visiting a New Age doctor instead of an MD. When students ask about "visual changes" I don't know how to answer unless they give examples.
• Eye movement: students almost always forget to tell me to follow the movement of the pen with my eyes only. If they tell me to follow the pen, I move my whole head and wait to see if they notice. Some don't -- which means I can't give them credit for doing an H exam. Most do, and when they stop to give me clearer instructions without apologizing, as a patient I often feel both embarrassed and annoyed.
• Checking visual fields: If a student asks "Do you see my fingers?" I turn my head to look at them. Yep, I see them. Tell me where to look if it matters!
• Shining a light in my eyes: tell me where to look. If you don't have to use the very brightest setting, please don't.
• Examining eyes with ophthalmoscope: tell me where to look. Also, tell me you're going to get so close to me before you do, or I might start backing away. Never touch my lips with your finger to brace yourself. If you're going to use my forehead to brace yourself, warn or ask me before you do it. If you're going to lift my eyelid up, definitely warn me -- but I recommend checking without lifting first to see if you can get what you need in the most minimally invasive way.
• Using a Snellen chart: if a student asks me to "read the smallest line" I read the text on the bottom of the card. Be specific if it matters!
• Checking hearing: I feel more comfortable if I am able to cover my ear rather than the student doctor doing it. If I can see the student doctor's hands while they rub their fingers together, that can affect the outcome of the exam. If a student doctor rubs their fingers together but doesn't ask me if I hear it, I do not respond. I really appreciate when students use words like "taco" or "raspberry" during the whisper tests rather than "ABC" or "123." I feel more comfortable during the Weber or Rinne tests when the student doctor clearly explains why and how they are using the tuning fork.
• Facial expressions: This is the part of the exam where I feel like I'm on Candid Camera. Tell me why you want me to make funny faces for you. Do not use the words "innervate" when you do. Some variation of this is fine: "I'd like to test some nerves in your face, so I'm going to ask you to make a few funny expressions. Can you [smiles/frown/etc]?" If the student-doctor does it with me, I don't feel quite as ridiculous. If the student-doctor asks me to puff out my cheeks but does not tell me to keep them puffed as they push them, I will let them collapse -- which sometimes leads students to believe there is a finding when there isn't.
• Opening eyes against resistance: Quite often, students ask me to close my eyes and then try to open them without warning me. As a patient this Freaks. Me. Out. Feeling fingers against my closed eyes is very alarming because eyes are so vulnerable. But here's what's worse: opening my eyes as the student is reaching for them because as a patient I didn't know there was more to the test beyond closing my eyes. Either way, as a patient I WILL flinch. If done inadequately, this test can make me feel extremely vulnerable and unsafe with the student doctor. If it has been prefaced by other tests that have affected my trust, this one has an even bigger impact.
• Checking for sensation: "Can you feel this?" is not the same as "Does this feel the same on both sides?" And if you just ask "Does this feel the same?" I am likely to say, "The same as what?" unless you've specified comparison on both sides. When student doctors don't warn me before checking for sensation on my arms/legs, it can feel a little creepy, especially when the person is of the opposite gender. When checking for facial sensation, if a student reached towards my eyes before telling me about the facial sensation test, I will often move my head because as a patient I have no idea why they are reaching for a vulnerable area.
• Tongue deviation: "Stick your tongue out" can feel weird unless the student explains why (hopefully as part of the facial expressions). If you want me to open my mouth, tell me. Also, "Wiggle your tongue around" is not the same as "Move your tongue from side to side."
• Gag reflex: Schools have a lot of different policies on this. Some specifically ask student not to do it, some ask the SPs to fake a gag reflex as soon as it is clear that's what the student is testing for. And sadly, some actually want their students to actually test the gag reflex. I have a lot of tolerance for internal exams, but when that happens I fake the gag reflex immediately.
• Resistance tests: I feel very strongly that all resistance tests should be framed simply as "Push/pull against me" rather than "So I'm going to try to put your [body part] into [a position]. Don't let me." or "Resist me." The negative instruction makes me spend an extra second or two trying to figure out what the student doctor wants me to do. Additionally, it makes it much harder to when the actual test begins, because students are generally already holding my body in the position they want me to resist before they finish the instruction. It's as complicated to write as it is to work it all out on the table.
• Shoulder/neck resistance: With shoulder resistance, students often start by pushing down on my shoulders and when I don't automatically push up, they then have to explain the test. Sometimes they will tell me to lift my shoulders up and then push down on them -- without telling me to resist, so I let them push me down. Some students interpret this as a positive sign. The easiest way to perform this test is for the student to push down on my shoulder and say, "Please shrug your shoulders." Relatedly, if a student asks me to "Turn your head into my hand," as a patient I don't know whether they want me to rotate my head or tilt it towards my shoulder.
• Leg resistance: Don't ask me to push up both thighs against resistance at same time. Seriously, have you ever tried that? Do one at a time.
• Sharp/dull testing: For goodness sake, demonstrate sharp/dull testing once on my arm before going through the whole thing so I know what to expect. This is a million times more important if you're going to do it on my face. Also, do not be surprised when different parts of my body are more sensitive than others. That does not indicate a positive finding -- it just means jabbing me on the top of my foot with the same force as the outside of my thigh hurts more because the nerves are closer to the surface of the skin. If you are too tentative with your sharps, though, you may get false dull patches -- as an SP I am dying to tell you when that happens, but as a patient I just assume that's part of the test. If, as a patient, I have findings during a sharp/dull test, I often act surprised unless the patient has already observed it in the case history. That often prompts students to check again -- and if I give them an answer they expect, they cannot resist saying "yes, that's right." If the school has the student use a safety pin (?!!!) and the student has not shown it to me but I see it after the test, as a patient I will feel alarmed and betrayed. If my hand is not in the right position and a student moves it into position without asking while my eyes are closed, I will feel especially vulnerable.
• Reflexes: The thing I hate most about reflex testing is that almost every student grabs my arm without asking me or telling me why -- and I hate it even more so when they grab my hands (thumbs up). Moving a patient without their consent violates bodily autonomy, and as a patient it teaches me you do not value my consent. It is SO EASY and vastly more respectful to ask "Could you please place your arm here [indicating their own arm and waiting]? Okay, now relax your arm." Also, as an SP I have excellent reflexes (in both upper & lower extremities), so it is disheartening to discover lots of students are not able to elicit my reflexes correctly.
• Point-to-point and Rapid alternating movement: When students don't explain rapid alternating movement, I feel like I'm playing a child's game. This is especially true for the finger-to-nose test: as a patient, I wonder if the student doctor think I'm drunk.
• Orientation questions: When students ask me orientation questions without explanation, it seems unnecessarily ominous and obscure. Some are at least aware enough to say, "I'm going to ask you some silly questions." But rarely do they say why. Try "...to rule out anything serious." Afterwards, I would feel relieved if I was jokingly congratulated for passing this most obvious of exams.
• Gait and balance: "Hop off the table" seems a bit too informal for my tastes. Clear instructions about how to walk and how far to walk and why make me feel more comfortable.

Extra credit!
Because the neuro exam has so many items, students often feel rushed. That makes me feel anxious. As the exam progresses, the accumulation of abrupt and opaque exams can foster distrust -- which makes me feel even more anxious and cautious. And the more time student have to spend explaining or re-explaining the tests, the more rushed they feel. So the more students can pre-invest in finding simple ways to explain and manage the neuro exam for SPs, the faster and easier it will be for everyone, including the patients they see later in their careers.